DISCOVER PROJECT

DISCOVER PROJECT

BRINGING CLARITY AND CONFIDENCE TO UW’S INNOVATION HUB

TEO Website Overhaul

Background

—The Technology Entrepreneurship Office (TEO) helps UW–Madison students, researchers, and faculty turn bold ideas into real-world startups.

Role

UX Design · Content Strategy · WordPress Development · Copywriting

Scope

6 Months · Client-Side Redesign

TEAM

1 UX Designer (Me), 1 Creative manager

Tools

Tools

Figma Logo

Figma

Photoshop Logo

Photoshop

Illustrator Logo

Illustrator

WordPress Logo

WordPress

Overview

Client Brief

"Evaluate the TEO website and uncover why engagement is low, Make our mission and offerings clearer to visitors."

problem

problem

problem

The TEO website's structure and messaging lacked clarity, users often felt unsure about where to go or what to engage with. As a result:

Valuable resources went unnoticed

Valuable resources went unnoticed

Valuable resources went unnoticed

Engagement with flagship programs remained low

Engagement with flagship programs remained low

Engagement with flagship programs remained low

Visitors left unsure how TEO could support their goals

Visitors left unsure how TEO could support their goals

Visitors left unsure how TEO could support their goals

Solution

Solution

Solution

We redesigned the site to help users quickly understand TEO and engage with its offerings.

Crafted clear, user-centered messaging to explain TEO’s mission, audience, and offerings.

Crafted clear, user-centered messaging to explain TEO’s mission, audience, and offerings.

Crafted clear, user-centered messaging to explain TEO’s mission, audience, and offerings.

Strengthened CTAs to make next steps obvious and engaging.

Strengthened CTAs to make next steps obvious and engaging.

Strengthened CTAs to make next steps obvious and engaging.

Added contextual cues to guide users through key pages and decisions

Added contextual cues to guide users through key pages and decisions

Added contextual cues to guide users through key pages and decisions

Impact

These changes led to measurable improvements in user engagement, clarity, and confidence across the site.
0
%

Decrease in Bounce Rates

0
%

Increase in Program Signups

2.5

x

Average time on site

7 in

10

Participant Felt More Confident Using the Site

TL;DR
TL;DR
TL;DR
TEO’s site lacked clarity—users didn’t know what it did or how to get started. We overhauled it with clear messaging, better navigation, and clear CTAs.
The result: lower bounce rates, higher engagement, and more signups.

Research Process

UX audit

Before testing with users, I did a full audit of the TEO website to understand where the structure and messaging fell short. Here are the top three issues I flagged:

Busy Hero, Fuzzy Message

The hero tried to do too much—research, mentorship, innovation but didn’t say what TEO is or who it’s for. Visually full, but lacking clarity.

01 Busy Hero, Fuzzy Message

02

Vision Before Clarity

03

Stacked, Not Structured

01 Busy Hero, Fuzzy Message

Luxury Residences

Experience unparalleled elegance in our luxury residences, featuring exquisite design, premium amenities, and prime locations for the most discerning tastes.

02

Eco Green Buildings

Eco Green Buildings

Discover sustainable living in our eco-friendly properties, designed to minimize environmental impact while offering modern comforts and energy efficiency.

03

Unique Vacation Homes

Unique Vacation Homes

Explore our curated collection of unique vacation homes, offering distinctive architecture and exceptional locations for unforgettable stays.

01 Busy Hero, Fuzzy Message

Luxury Residences

Experience unparalleled elegance in our luxury residences, featuring exquisite design, premium amenities, and prime locations for the most discerning tastes.

02

Eco Green Buildings

Eco Green Buildings

Discover sustainable living in our eco-friendly properties, designed to minimize environmental impact while offering modern comforts and energy efficiency.

03

Unique Vacation Homes

Unique Vacation Homes

Explore our curated collection of unique vacation homes, offering distinctive architecture and exceptional locations for unforgettable stays.

Usability study - 1

Usability study - 1

Usability study - 1

I observed 5 participants—2 student entrepreneurs, 1 grad researcher, and 2 faculty members—navigate the original TEO website with open-ended prompts like:

“Try to find a program that supports your business idea.”

“Try to find a program that supports your business idea.”

“Try to find a program that supports your business idea.”

“Where would you go to get involved with TEO?”

“Where would you go to get involved with TEO?”

“Where would you go to get involved with TEO?”

Here’s what they struggled with:

Unclear What TEO Does

🗣:

"Is this for launching startups? Or more for university research?"

👥:

2 out of 5 users couldn’t describe what TEO does

Confusing CTAs

🗣:

"Am I supposed to submit? Or just learn first?"

👥:

Button labels lacked clarity and context

Misleading Navigation

🗣:

"I clicked ‘Events’ thinking it would show programs."

👥:

3 out of 5 misclicked nav labels

Skipped Hero

🗣:

"I just skipped that photo and scrolled right away."

👥:

Most users ignored the hero entirely

No User Paths

🗣

"Where would I go as a student with an idea?"

👥

No clear starting points by user type

Affinity Mapping

After the usability walkthroughs, I had a long list of raw notes, quotes, and scattered observations. To make sense of it all—and figure out what to actually solve—I created an affinity map. Grouping user feedback helped me spot patterns, align pain points with design problems, and pull out themes that shaped the redesign.

From the affinity mapping, four key themes stood out. These weren’t just isolated quotes—they reflected consistent breakdowns in clarity, guidance, and flow across the site.

Personas

To ground design decisions in real needs, I created two primary personas based on common behaviors and frustrations observed in testing. These aren’t fictional—they reflect the roles, mindsets, and goals of the users I interviewed.
🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I’ve got an idea... now what?”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I need help moving my research into the real world.”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I’ve got an idea... now what?”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I need help moving my research into the real world.”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I’ve got an idea... now what?”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

🧑‍🎓 Nia – Student Entrepreneur

“I need help moving my research into the real world.”

Engineering undergrad looking to launch something real. Struggled with confusing labels and no clear starting point.

➡ Needs: simple CTAs, student-first content, next steps.

Jorney map

This user journey map follows Nia, a first-time student entrepreneur, as she navigates the original TEO website. Based on real usability walkthroughs, it highlights key breakdowns—like vague headlines, confusing CTAs, and a lack of entry points. Each step captures her actions, thoughts, and emotional drop-off, showing how poor site structure led her from curiosity to confusion, frustration, and eventually exit.
TL;DR
TL;DR
TL;DR
Conducted a full UX audit, 5 user walkthroughs, and affinity mapping to uncover major breakdowns in clarity, navigation, and messaging. Built personas and journey maps to reveal gaps in role-specific guidance—surfacing patterns that shaped the redesign priorities.

Defining the Problem

How Might We

Framer

is

a

design

tool

that

clarify TEO’s purpose? simplify program exploration? encourage quick, confident action?

clarify TEO’s purpose? simplify program exploration? encourage quick, confident action?

Implementation

Copywriting

I wrote the copy first to understand the content's size, themes, and tone—so the layout could reflect what we were actually saying. It helped me choose the right visuals—each design decision flowed from meaning, not placeholders.

Information Architecture

To create a smoother user journey, I restructured the site’s navigation to better reflect how real users explore and engage with TEO.

Wireframes & A/B Testing

I created two versions of the homepage wireframe in Figma to test how different layouts impacted user attention, content comprehension, and engagement. Instead of wireframing every page, I focused on 5 high-impact sections — including the hero, CTA blocks, and video module — where layout decisions most influence first impressions and user flow.
  1. Hero - section

Version 1 used a centered layout that felt dense and hard to scan.


Version 2 introduced a split layout with a visual anchor to support quicker comprehension.

Next

Wireframe v1

Wireframe v2

  1. Hero - section

Version 1 used a centered layout that felt dense and hard to scan.


Version 2 introduced a split layout with a visual anchor to support quicker comprehension.

Next

Wireframe v1

Wireframe v2

  1. Hero - section

Version 1 used a centered layout that felt dense and hard to scan.


Version 2 introduced a split layout with a visual anchor to support quicker comprehension.

Next

Wireframe v1

Wireframe v2

Since this was a campus-affiliated site, I followed UW–Madison’s branding guidelines for colors, typography, and accessibility. But I also aimed to make it feel clear and welcoming — not overly institutional.
Since this was a campus-affiliated site, I followed UW–Madison’s branding guidelines for colors, typography, and accessibility. But I also aimed to make it feel clear and welcoming — not overly institutional.
Since this was a campus-affiliated site, I followed UW–Madison’s branding guidelines for colors, typography, and accessibility. But I also aimed to make it feel clear and welcoming — not overly institutional.

Wordpress Implementation

The final build used UW–Madison’s WordPress framework, so I worked within its constraints to create a site that still felt clear and user-centered. Here's how:

Tweaked theme settings to improve mobile responsiveness (especially stacked cards and CTAs)

Used semantic HTML (<section>, <nav>, etc.) to enhance screen reader flow

Manually added alt-text, ARIA labels, and WCAG 2.2 tags for better accessibility

The result? A frontend that looked like our Illustrator and Figma files — but worked like a fast, standards-compliant UW site.

Usability study 2

After finalizing the high-fidelity designs, I conducted a second round of usability testing with 4 new users to identify any lingering clarity issues and refine the content and layout before the website went live. This round focused on how well users could scan key sections, understand TEO’s purpose, and feel confident taking action.
Hero Section
Original Design
User Feedback
Changes Made
Hero Section
Simple intro without emphasis
"It was hard to skim through the text."
Made the intro paragraph scannable using bolded key phrases
What We Offer -Section
Bright red cards and heavy backgrounds
"The red background is harsh, I can't focus on the cards."
Replaced the red background with a neutral tone for visual ease
Homepage banner
Generic button label
"I didn’t feel drawn to click the button."
Reworded the CTA label to make it more action-oriented and specific

Results:

  • 100% of participants could explain what TEO does after viewing the hero section

  • 3 out of 4 clicked the flagship CTA within 15 seconds

Results:

  • 100% of participants could explain what TEO does after viewing the hero section

  • 3 out of 4 clicked the flagship CTA within 15 seconds

Results:

  • 100% of participants could explain what TEO does after viewing the hero section

  • 3 out of 4 clicked the flagship CTA within 15 seconds

TL;DR
TL;DR
TL;DR
I rewrote key copy for clarity and action, prototyped and tested multiple layouts, then built the final design using UW’s WordPress theme. The result? A responsive, user-guided site where visitors immediately understand TEO’s role and take action faster.

Final Design

REFLECTION

REFLECTION

REFLECTION

This project wasn’t about adding flashy features—it was about removing friction. The biggest win? Learning to step back and listen.
Every meaningful design decision came from real conversations: with first-time visitors, grad students, and researchers trying to navigate the site.
By stripping back the noise and prioritizing clarity, we made space for TEO’s message to come through.
This project wasn’t about adding flashy features—it was about removing friction. The biggest win? Learning to step back and listen.
Every meaningful design decision came from real conversations: with first-time visitors, grad students, and researchers trying to navigate the site.
By stripping back the noise and prioritizing clarity, we made space for TEO’s message to come through.
This project wasn’t about adding flashy features—it was about removing friction. The biggest win? Learning to step back and listen.
Every meaningful design decision came from real conversations: with first-time visitors, grad students, and researchers trying to navigate the site.
By stripping back the noise and prioritizing clarity, we made space for TEO’s message to come through.
TL;DR
TL;DR
TL;DR
The redesign led to a 40% drop in bounce rate, a 15% increase in signups, and 2.5× more time spent on site. 7 in 10 users felt more confident navigating the site. Beyond the numbers, this project reinforced how clarity, tone, and small UX decisions can build trust and drive action.